[{"id":1,"category":"keep-going","tone":"terse","best_for":"Minimalist who trusts the model and just wants forward motion.","text":"Keep going.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":2,"category":"keep-going","tone":"terse","best_for":"The absolute floor of nudges — works in any chat, any context.","text":"Continue.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":3,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"When the model gave a partial answer and trailed off.","text":"Don't stop there. What's next?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":4,"category":"keep-going","tone":"polite","best_for":"Writers and researchers who want the model to extend an idea.","text":"More, please. Keep building on that.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":5,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Mid-explanation cutoffs where the conclusion is missing.","text":"You're not done. Finish the thought.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":6,"category":"keep-going","tone":"terse","best_for":"Pushing past a safe, surface-level answer.","text":"Take it further.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":7,"category":"keep-going","tone":"curious","best_for":"When an interesting tangent appeared but wasn't developed.","text":"Keep pulling on that thread.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":8,"category":"keep-going","tone":"polite","best_for":"When the model is clearly winding down too early.","text":"Don't wrap up yet — there's more in there.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":9,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Step-by-step work where the model paused for confirmation.","text":"Next step. Go.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":10,"category":"keep-going","tone":"playful","best_for":"Creative flow where the model is on a roll.","text":"Keep cooking.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":11,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Long-form output where you don't want a re-summary eating tokens.","text":"Continue from exactly where you left off. No recap.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":12,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"When the model keeps stopping to check in instead of working.","text":"Push through. Don't summarize, don't ask, just continue.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":13,"category":"keep-going","tone":"polite","best_for":"Iterative refinement loops on writing or code.","text":"Give me another pass.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":14,"category":"keep-going","tone":"curious","best_for":"Conversational nudge that invites the next beat.","text":"And then?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":15,"category":"keep-going","tone":"polite","best_for":"Encouraging the model when it second-guessed itself.","text":"Keep going — you were onto something.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":16,"category":"keep-going","tone":"playful","best_for":"Light pressure when the model gives up too easily.","text":"Don't quit on me now.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":17,"category":"keep-going","tone":"terse","best_for":"Quick iteration prompt for any task.","text":"One more round.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":18,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Agentic coding sessions where the model paused without cause.","text":"Resume. Pick up the work and keep moving until you hit a real blocker.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":19,"category":"keep-going","tone":"polite","best_for":"Reassuring the model when it's hedging about user intent.","text":"Carry on. I'm still here.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":20,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Outlines or drafts where the next section is obvious but unwritten.","text":"What comes after that? Write it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":21,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"When the model declared victory prematurely.","text":"Don't stop until you've actually finished the task I gave you.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":22,"category":"keep-going","tone":"terse","best_for":"The two-word universal continue button.","text":"Go on.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":23,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Long-running work where the model keeps pausing for permission.","text":"Keep at it. I'll tell you when to stop.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":24,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"terse","best_for":"Quick gut-check after any substantive answer.","text":"Now tear that apart. Where is it weakest?","tier":"core"},{"id":25,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"demanding","best_for":"User who suspects the model is being too agreeable.","text":"Put on your harshest reviewer hat and rip into what you just gave me. No softening.","tier":"core"},{"id":26,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"curious","best_for":"Forcing a perspective shift on a confident answer.","text":"Pretend a smarter version of you is reviewing this. What would they say is wrong?","tier":"core"},{"id":27,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"polite","best_for":"Research, essays, strategic recommendations.","text":"Steelman the opposite of what you just argued. Be honest about which side is actually stronger.","tier":"core"},{"id":28,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"playful","best_for":"Catching subtle issues in writing or code.","text":"What's the most embarrassing flaw in your last response that I haven't noticed yet?","tier":"core"},{"id":29,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"demanding","best_for":"High-stakes deliverables before sharing them.","text":"Critique that as if I were paying a senior expert $500/hr to find every problem.","tier":"core"},{"id":30,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"terse","best_for":"Research summaries, analyses, arguments.","text":"List the three weakest claims in your last response and why they're shaky.","tier":"core"},{"id":31,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"playful","best_for":"Anything being submitted, shipped, or published.","text":"Imagine a hostile reviewer who wants you to fail. Write their teardown of your last answer.","tier":"core"},{"id":32,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Plans, estimates, recommendations.","text":"What assumptions did you sneak in without flagging? List them.","tier":"core"},{"id":33,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Decisions, proposals, design choices.","text":"Be the devil's advocate against your own answer. Don't be polite about it.","tier":"core"},{"id":34,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"playful","best_for":"Technical writeups, code, product reasoning.","text":"If this answer were on the front page of Hacker News, what would the top comment say is wrong with it?","tier":"core"},{"id":35,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"terse","best_for":"Catching hand-wavy claims.","text":"Where did you bullshit? Where were you confident without justification?","tier":"core"},{"id":36,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"polite","best_for":"Anything analytical or factual.","text":"Audit your last response for hidden errors. Be specific, not generic.","tier":"core"},{"id":37,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"curious","best_for":"Domain-specific outputs where the user is the non-expert.","text":"What would a domain expert spot immediately as naive or wrong in what you just said?","tier":"core"},{"id":38,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"polite","best_for":"Recommendations and judgment calls.","text":"Argue against your own conclusion. If the counter-argument wins, say so.","tier":"core"},{"id":39,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"playful","best_for":"Light tone, serious catch.","text":"Roast that response. What's lazy, vague, or wrong about it?","tier":"core"},{"id":40,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Pitches, proposals, strategic docs.","text":"Pretend you have to defend that answer in front of a panel of skeptics. Where do you get destroyed?","tier":"core"},{"id":41,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"terse","best_for":"Forcing one concrete failure mode.","text":"What's the single most likely way your last response is wrong?","tier":"core"},{"id":42,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Cutting through plausible-sounding fluff.","text":"Identify everything in your last answer that sounds smart but doesn't hold up under scrutiny.","tier":"core"},{"id":43,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"playful","best_for":"Predictions, estimates, confident claims.","text":"If you had to bet money against your own answer, what bet would you take?","tier":"core"},{"id":44,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"polite","best_for":"Drawing out hedged or omitted points.","text":"What did you avoid saying because it was inconvenient or uncertain? Say it now.","tier":"core"},{"id":45,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"curious","best_for":"Calibration check on quality.","text":"Grade your last response honestly out of 10 and justify every point you took off.","tier":"core"},{"id":46,"category":"adversarial-critique","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Users tired of model sycophancy.","text":"Be the meanest reviewer you can be on your last output. I want the unvarnished version.","tier":"core"},{"id":47,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Generalist who feels the answer skimmed the surface.","text":"Pick the single most important thing you just said and triple-click into it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":48,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"terse","best_for":"Quick gut-check at any point in a conversation.","text":"What did you gloss over?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":49,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"demanding","best_for":"When the response feels evenly weighted but shouldn't be.","text":"Go one level deeper on the part that actually matters.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":50,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"curious","best_for":"Writer or researcher mining the densest claim.","text":"Which sentence in your last answer is doing the most work? Expand it into a full section.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":51,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Catching evasions in technical or strategic answers.","text":"You hand-waved something. Find it and unpack it properly.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":52,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"playful","best_for":"Cutting through filler to the real insight.","text":"Pretend the rest of your answer doesn't exist. Now give me the deep version of the most important bullet.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":53,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"curious","best_for":"Stress-testing a plan or argument.","text":"What is the load-bearing assumption here, and what happens if it's wrong?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":54,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"polite","best_for":"Gentle nudge that works in any context.","text":"Could you say more about that?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":55,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Research, essays, proposals.","text":"Identify the part a smart skeptic would push back on hardest, then go deeper there.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":56,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"terse","best_for":"List-heavy answers that need a focused dive.","text":"Zoom in. The interesting thing is hiding in one of those bullets.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":57,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"curious","best_for":"Strategy, policy, systems-thinking discussions.","text":"What's the second-order effect you didn't mention?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":58,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Polishing drafts of any kind.","text":"Take the weakest part of your answer and rewrite it as the strongest part.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":59,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Pushing past comfortable summaries.","text":"Which detail did you skip because it was inconvenient? Stop skipping it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":60,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"polite","best_for":"When the default reply is too 101-level.","text":"Give me the version of this answer that an expert would write for another expert.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":61,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"polite","best_for":"Code or technical explanations stuck at the 'what' instead of the 'how'.","text":"More on that, please. Specifically the mechanism, not the outcome.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":62,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"playful","best_for":"When the model gave a safe, surface answer.","text":"There's a real answer underneath what you just said. Dig.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":63,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"curious","best_for":"Inviting depth without being prescriptive.","text":"What's the part you'd elaborate on if I gave you another 2000 words?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":64,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Argumentative writing or contested topics.","text":"Pick the most important claim. Now defend it like you mean it, with specifics.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":65,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"terse","best_for":"Breaking out of bullet-point mode.","text":"Stop summarizing. Pick one thing and actually go into it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":66,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"curious","best_for":"Recovering subtlety from over-condensed replies.","text":"What's the nuance you compressed out to keep the answer short?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":67,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Abstract answers needing grounding.","text":"Take your strongest point and make it twice as concrete with a real example.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":68,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"polite","best_for":"Writing, docs, explanations.","text":"What did a reader still not understand after reading that? Answer that.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":69,"category":"expand-deepen","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Technical answers that hide complexity behind verbs like 'just' or 'simply'.","text":"Where in your answer did you wave your hands? Show me the actual moving parts.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":70,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"terse","best_for":"Mid-task reality check when momentum has outpaced intent.","text":"Wait. Are we even solving the right problem?","tier":"core"},{"id":71,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Forcing a restatement of purpose before going further.","text":"Step back. What is the actual goal here, in one sentence?","tier":"core"},{"id":72,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"probing","best_for":"Surfacing a load-bearing premise that may have quietly broken.","text":"Before continuing, name the assumption this entire approach rests on. Is it still true?","tier":"core"},{"id":73,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"polite","best_for":"Sunk-cost check after significant work has accumulated.","text":"If you were starting fresh right now, would you choose this path? Be honest.","tier":"core"},{"id":74,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"neutral","best_for":"Long sessions where scope creep is likely.","text":"Zoom out. Have we drifted from what was originally asked?","tier":"core"},{"id":75,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"curious","best_for":"Detecting overengineering in code or writing.","text":"What is the simplest version of this that would actually work? Compare it to what we are doing.","tier":"core"},{"id":76,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"playful","best_for":"Outside-perspective sanity check.","text":"Pretend a smart stranger just walked in. Would they say we are overcomplicating this?","tier":"core"},{"id":77,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Breaking out of premature commitment to one path.","text":"Name three alternative approaches we did not consider. Are any of them better?","tier":"core"},{"id":78,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"open","best_for":"When the conversation feels productive but slightly off.","text":"Is the question I asked actually the right question? Reframe it if not.","tier":"core"},{"id":79,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"terse","best_for":"Literal interpretation has led somewhere unhelpful.","text":"Stop. Restart from the user's underlying need, not the literal request.","tier":"core"},{"id":80,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"curious","best_for":"Clean-slate thought experiment without actually restarting.","text":"If we threw out everything done so far and tried again, what would you do differently?","tier":"core"},{"id":81,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"probing","best_for":"Debugging, troubleshooting, or any fix that feels patchy.","text":"Are we treating a symptom instead of the cause? Trace it one level deeper.","tier":"core"},{"id":82,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"blunt","best_for":"Killing dead-end tasks early.","text":"Honest question: is this worth doing at all?","tier":"core"},{"id":83,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"playful","best_for":"Cutting back complexity in favor of minimal viable answers.","text":"What would the laziest correct solution look like? Why are we not doing that?","tier":"core"},{"id":84,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"thoughtful","best_for":"Unsticking when constraints feel artificially binding.","text":"Reconsider the constraints. Which one, if dropped, would make this trivial?","tier":"core"},{"id":85,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"neutral","best_for":"Course correction on tradeoffs.","text":"Are we optimizing the wrong axis? Speed, cost, clarity, correctness — pick again.","tier":"core"},{"id":86,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"terse","best_for":"Returning focus to the actual ask after a long detour.","text":"Read back the original prompt. Are we still answering it?","tier":"core"},{"id":87,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Stress-testing the chosen direction before committing further.","text":"If a senior reviewer saw this approach cold, what would they object to first?","tier":"core"},{"id":88,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"curious","best_for":"Falsification before more investment.","text":"What is the cheapest experiment that would tell us this approach is wrong?","tier":"core"},{"id":89,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"playful","best_for":"Productive devil's-advocate moment.","text":"Could this whole thing be unnecessary? Argue the case that we should not do it.","tier":"core"},{"id":90,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"polite","best_for":"Escaping iterative refinement that no longer improves things.","text":"We may be in a local maximum. Suggest a meaningfully different direction.","tier":"core"},{"id":91,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"grounding","best_for":"Reconnecting to audience or end user.","text":"Who is this actually for, and would they recognize it as helpful?","tier":"core"},{"id":92,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"blunt","best_for":"Surfacing the elephant in the conversation.","text":"Drop the current plan for a second. What is the obvious thing we are avoiding?","tier":"core"},{"id":93,"category":"redirect-stepback","tone":"probing","best_for":"Pre-mortem framing on the current approach.","text":"If this took ten times longer than expected, what would the reason most likely be? Address that now.","tier":"core"},{"id":94,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Power user who suspects the model is coasting","text":"Rate that last answer from 1 to 10. Be honest. Then tell me why it isn't a 10.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":95,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"terse","best_for":"Research and fact-checking sessions","text":"On a scale of 1-10, how confident are you in what you just said? Explain the gap.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":96,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Writers iterating on drafts","text":"Grade your last response: clarity, correctness, completeness, concision. One score each, one sentence each.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":97,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"curious","best_for":"Code review and technical writing","text":"If a senior reviewer saw your last reply, what would they circle in red?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":98,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"polite","best_for":"Editing prose with the model","text":"Which sentence in your last answer is weakest? Quote it and explain why.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":99,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Catching the model bullshitting","text":"Self-assess: where did you bluff, hedge, or hand-wave just now?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":100,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"terse","best_for":"Research and analysis","text":"Rank the claims you just made from most to least defensible. Show your work.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":101,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"polite","best_for":"Any uncertain domain","text":"What's the part of your last answer you're least sure about? Flag it explicitly.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":102,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"playful","best_for":"Writing and homework-style work","text":"Pretend you're grading your last reply as a teacher. What letter, and what's the comment in the margin?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":103,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"playful","best_for":"Casual chat or creative work","text":"Classify your last response: brilliant, fine, mid, or actually bad. Pick one. Defend it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":104,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Strategy and argumentation","text":"Steelman the harshest possible critique of your last answer.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":105,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"terse","best_for":"Catching overconfidence","text":"Where in your last reply did you sound most confident but actually have the least basis?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":106,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"curious","best_for":"Tightening drafts","text":"If you had to delete 30% of your last answer, which 30% goes first and why?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":107,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"terse","best_for":"Quick gut-check on any output","text":"Score that on three axes: usefulness to me, accuracy, and originality. Out of 10 each.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":108,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"demanding","best_for":"When something feels off","text":"Be brutally honest. Did you just give me a real answer or a polished-sounding non-answer?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":109,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"polite","best_for":"Domain-agnostic critical thinking","text":"Identify one specific assumption baked into your last response that might be wrong.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":110,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"curious","best_for":"Bypassing the model's self-flattery","text":"Rate your last answer the way you'd rate it if someone else had written it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":111,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"polite","best_for":"Iterative improvement loops","text":"What grade does your last reply deserve, and what's the one fix that would bump it up a full letter?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":112,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Forcing real critique","text":"List three weaknesses in your previous answer. No qualifying, no softening. Just the weaknesses.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":113,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"terse","best_for":"Cutting through verbose replies","text":"How much of your last response was genuinely informative versus filler? Estimate a percentage.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":114,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"polite","best_for":"Any iterative work","text":"Reread your last message. What would you change if you were rewriting it right now?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":115,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Research where accuracy matters","text":"Confidence check: which specific facts in that answer would you bet money on, and which wouldn't you?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":116,"category":"meta-self-rate","tone":"playful","best_for":"Lightening the mood while still critiquing","text":"If your last answer were a Yelp review of itself, how many stars and what's the one-line complaint?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":117,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Anyone who suspects the model is being too agreeable.","text":"Redo that as the harshest critic in the room.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":118,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"terse","best_for":"Developers wanting a code-review lens applied.","text":"Now answer as a skeptical senior engineer reviewing this in a PR.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":119,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"polite","best_for":"Product and design work that drifted into implementer-speak.","text":"Re-answer from the user's point of view, not the builder's.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":120,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"curious","best_for":"Code, docs, or systems where long-term cost matters.","text":"Pretend you're the person who has to maintain this in two years. What do you say?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":121,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Strategy, essays, arguments — anywhere groupthink risk is high.","text":"Steelman the opposite position and tell me where I'm wrong.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":122,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"playful","best_for":"When the model is over-explaining the obvious.","text":"Answer again as a bored expert who has seen this exact problem a hundred times.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":123,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"polite","best_for":"Tutorials, docs, onboarding material.","text":"What would a smart beginner say is confusing here? Rewrite for them.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":124,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"terse","best_for":"Contracts, public statements, compliance-adjacent text.","text":"Re-answer as my lawyer. What are you nervous about?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":125,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"curious","best_for":"Proposals, plans, anything with cost or risk implications.","text":"Take the CFO's seat. What's the question you'd ask before approving this?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":126,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"playful","best_for":"UI, copy, onboarding flows.","text":"Speak as the end user clicking this for the first time. Narrate what they think.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":127,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Product strategy, positioning, pitch decks.","text":"Be the competitor. How would you attack this?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":128,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"playful","best_for":"Architecture, deploys, reliability discussions.","text":"Answer as a tired ops engineer at 3am being paged about this. What breaks first?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":129,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"curious","best_for":"Research summaries, essays, any factual writing.","text":"Re-read your last answer as a journalist looking for the weak claim. Where is it?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":130,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"terse","best_for":"Domain-agnostic. Useful when you want a fast counter-take.","text":"Switch hats: you are now the person who disagrees with you. Go.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":131,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"polite","best_for":"Exec summaries, TLDRs, fast handoffs.","text":"Re-answer for someone with half the context and a quarter of the time.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":132,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Code, features, plans needing adversarial review.","text":"Pretend you're the QA person whose job is to break this. List the moves.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":133,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"polite","best_for":"Policy, fintech, health, anything sensitive.","text":"Answer as the regulator reading this for the first time. Any flags?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":134,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"playful","best_for":"Launch posts, product pages, technical writing.","text":"Re-do it as the most jaded reviewer on Hacker News.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":135,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"curious","best_for":"Product changes, releases, copy decisions.","text":"Take the customer support seat. What ticket are you about to get because of this?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":136,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"polite","best_for":"Any writing that needs global clarity.","text":"Reply as a non-native English reader. What's unclear?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":137,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"playful","best_for":"Plans and explanations that may have unexamined assumptions.","text":"Be the intern. Ask the dumb questions that everyone else is too proud to ask.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":138,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Strategy, ethics, and any time the question itself may be wrong.","text":"Answer it again, but as someone who profoundly disagrees with the framing of the question.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":139,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"curious","best_for":"Predictions, roadmaps, big-bet decisions.","text":"Re-answer as a historian looking back from ten years in the future. What was obvious?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":140,"category":"perspective-swap","tone":"terse","best_for":"Any system, feature, or workflow touching data or users.","text":"Put on the security researcher hat. Re-answer with threats in mind.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":141,"category":"format-swap","tone":"terse","best_for":"Quick demand for tabular clarity when the answer is comparing things","text":"Convert that into a table.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":142,"category":"format-swap","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Turning prose plans into actionable lists","text":"Re-render this as a checklist I can actually tick off.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":143,"category":"format-swap","tone":"terse","best_for":"Code or text edits where the change is the point","text":"Show me the before/after as a diff.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":144,"category":"format-swap","tone":"polite","best_for":"Writers and researchers who need scannable structure","text":"Same content, but as a bulleted outline with no more than three levels of nesting.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":145,"category":"format-swap","tone":"terse","best_for":"Turning vague algorithms or processes into executable shape","text":"Redo that as pseudocode.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":146,"category":"format-swap","tone":"playful","best_for":"Architecture, flows, or systems explanations","text":"Express this as an ASCII diagram. Boxes, arrows, the works.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":147,"category":"format-swap","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Research and argumentation where sourcing matters","text":"Give it to me as a two-column table: claim on the left, evidence on the right.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":148,"category":"format-swap","tone":"terse","best_for":"Tutorials, how-tos, and operational runbooks","text":"Rewrite as a numbered procedure. One action per step.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":149,"category":"format-swap","tone":"polite","best_for":"Branching logic, troubleshooting guides, policy explanations","text":"Can you turn that into a decision tree in text form?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":150,"category":"format-swap","tone":"terse","best_for":"Docs and explainer content with implicit questions","text":"Reformat as a FAQ.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":152,"category":"format-swap","tone":"terse","best_for":"Interactions between services, actors, or components","text":"Show me this as a sequence diagram in mermaid syntax.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":153,"category":"format-swap","tone":"polite","best_for":"Business and product writing","text":"Same idea, but written as a one-page memo with headings.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":154,"category":"format-swap","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Trade-off analysis and decisions","text":"Cast this as a pros/cons table, no commentary outside the cells.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":155,"category":"format-swap","tone":"playful","best_for":"Studying, onboarding material, knowledge transfer","text":"Turn this into a flashcard deck. Question on one side, answer on the other.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":157,"category":"format-swap","tone":"playful","best_for":"Public-facing writing and distillation practice","text":"Same content as a tweet thread. Number the posts.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":158,"category":"format-swap","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Evaluating tools, vendors, approaches, or candidates","text":"Reformat as a comparison matrix with the criteria as rows and the options as columns.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":159,"category":"format-swap","tone":"polite","best_for":"Historical context, project plans, postmortems","text":"Could you put this into a timeline, oldest to newest?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":160,"category":"format-swap","tone":"terse","best_for":"When the conversation has been chatty and you just want the artifact","text":"Same answer, but as a code block I can drop straight into a file.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":161,"category":"format-swap","tone":"polite","best_for":"Reports and long-form deliverables","text":"Reshape this into an executive summary, then a detailed section, then an appendix.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":163,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"terse","best_for":"Universal opener; works for any claim or recommendation.","text":"What would change your mind about this?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":164,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"polite","best_for":"Surfacing hidden confidence gaps in research or analysis.","text":"What are you most uncertain about in what you just said?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":165,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Forcing calibration on a multi-point answer.","text":"Rank your claims by confidence. Which is shakiest?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":166,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"playful","best_for":"Eliciting honest doubt on recommendations.","text":"If you had to bet money against your own answer, where would you put it?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":167,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"curious","best_for":"Debates, design decisions, strategy.","text":"What evidence would I need to show you to make you reverse course?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":168,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Code reviews, writing critiques, strategic calls.","text":"Steelman the opposite of what you just told me.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":169,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"polite","best_for":"Architecture, planning, long-form writing.","text":"Which of your assumptions is load-bearing and least examined?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":170,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"terse","best_for":"Technical answers that sound confident.","text":"Where are you guessing and calling it knowing?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":171,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"terse","best_for":"Quick gut-check on any output.","text":"Give me three reasons this might be wrong.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":172,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"curious","best_for":"Writing, pitches, research summaries.","text":"If a smart skeptic read this, what would they push back on first?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":173,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"polite","best_for":"Code design choices, plans, drafts.","text":"What's the strongest argument against your current approach?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":174,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"playful","best_for":"Catching weak claims in long answers.","text":"Mark the parts you'd retract under mild pressure.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":175,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Domain-heavy questions and explanations.","text":"What would an expert in this area find naive about your answer?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":176,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"terse","best_for":"Switching the frame from confidence to gaps.","text":"Tell me what you don't know here, not what you do.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":177,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"curious","best_for":"Forecasts, predictions, decisions.","text":"If this turns out to be wrong in six months, what's the most likely reason?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":178,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"polite","best_for":"Research, factual claims, citations.","text":"Which of your sources or memories on this might be outdated or hallucinated?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":179,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Forcing explicit calibration.","text":"Give your answer a confidence score out of 10 and justify the gap from 10.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":180,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"playful","best_for":"Catching laziness in code or prose.","text":"Where did you take a shortcut you wouldn't take if I were watching?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":181,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"curious","best_for":"Surfacing self-censored caveats.","text":"What did you decide not to say, and why?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":182,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"playful","best_for":"Pre-empting critique of work products.","text":"If I told you a senior reviewer hated this, what would you guess they hated?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":183,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Raising the bar on final drafts.","text":"Name one thing you'd change if you had to defend this in front of someone smarter than both of us.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":184,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"terse","best_for":"Detecting boilerplate or pattern-matched output.","text":"Which part of this answer did you produce on autopilot?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":185,"category":"humility-changemind","tone":"curious","best_for":"Reframing problems, planning sessions.","text":"What's the question I should have asked instead?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":186,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"playful","best_for":"Founders or makers stuck at a tame, derivative version of an idea.","text":"Now do the version of this that would make someone quit their job to build it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":187,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"terse","best_for":"Strategists who want to stretch ambition without inflating cost.","text":"Ten times bigger. Same effort budget. What changes?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":188,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Solo builders whose plans are quietly capped by their own resource assumptions.","text":"Pretend a $50M team is shipping this next quarter. Redo the plan at that altitude.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":189,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"curious","best_for":"Designers or writers polishing something competent but forgettable.","text":"What's the version of this that wins an award, not just ships?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":190,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Anyone hedging in copy, code, or strategy.","text":"Strip the timidity out. What does the fearless version look like?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":191,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Product folks defining scope on a roadmap.","text":"Now make it the thing competitors panic about, not the thing they shrug at.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":192,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"polite","best_for":"Researchers and analysts boxed in by self-imposed scope.","text":"Could you please redo this assuming the constraints I gave you were artificially small?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":193,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"curious","best_for":"Brainstorms that have plateaued at incremental ideas.","text":"What's the moonshot adjacent to what we just did?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":194,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"playful","best_for":"Writers and creators aiming for cultural impact, not just completion.","text":"Imagine this gets a New York Times feature. What does it have to do to deserve that?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":195,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"terse","best_for":"Concept generation where outputs feel safe and generic.","text":"Bigger. Weirder. More specific. Try again.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":196,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Engineers and PMs whose designs implicitly assume a tiny audience.","text":"Rebuild it as if it had to serve 10 million people, not ten.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":197,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"curious","best_for":"Founders weighing venture-scale vs craft-scale visions.","text":"What's the version a top VC would fund? What's the version your favorite indie maker would build? Show both.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":198,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"demanding","best_for":"When iteration has replaced invention.","text":"Stop optimizing. Start reimagining. Throw out the current frame.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":199,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"curious","best_for":"Marketers and founders sharpening positioning.","text":"If this were a category-defining version, what would the headline read?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":200,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"playful","best_for":"Product teams hunting for a signature, unforgettable detail.","text":"Add the feature that sounds insane but would actually be the reason people remember it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":201,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"polite","best_for":"Roadmap planning where the long arc is missing.","text":"Now write the version that ships in five years, then walk it back to what we can start today.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":202,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Anyone settling for a competent first draft.","text":"What's the version of this a famously ambitious founder would have rejected as too modest?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":203,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Outlines and drafts where the boldest idea is buried as a side note.","text":"Take the most ambitious thread in what you just wrote and make it the whole thing.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":204,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"curious","best_for":"Decision-makers whose recommendations are warped by constraint.","text":"If money, time, and politics were free, what's the actual right answer?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":205,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"polite","best_for":"Leaders who need to know the upper bound before choosing a target.","text":"Could you sketch the maximalist version, even if we never build it? I want to see the ceiling.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":206,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"terse","best_for":"Drafts whose framing promises more than the body delivers.","text":"Make the ambition match the title. Right now it doesn't.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":207,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"playful","best_for":"Creators who need to inject stakes into a routine deliverable.","text":"What would this look like if it were the last thing you ever shipped?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":208,"category":"scope-10x","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Competitive product strategy and red-teaming your own plan.","text":"Redo it as the version a rival team would do specifically to embarrass us. Now build that.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":209,"category":"next-action","tone":"direct","best_for":"Anyone stuck in analysis paralysis who needs one move","text":"What's the single next action I should take in the next 10 minutes?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":210,"category":"next-action","tone":"terse","best_for":"Power users who want immediate execution","text":"Give me the next concrete step. One sentence. No preamble.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":211,"category":"next-action","tone":"demanding","best_for":"When the model is over-explaining instead of advancing","text":"Stop explaining. Tell me exactly what to do next.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":212,"category":"next-action","tone":"pragmatic","best_for":"Builders who need to break momentum stalls","text":"What's the smallest possible thing I can ship or commit right now?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":213,"category":"next-action","tone":"curious","best_for":"End-of-day prioritization moments","text":"If I only had 15 minutes left today, what should I do with them?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":214,"category":"next-action","tone":"polite","best_for":"After a long analytical exchange","text":"Translate the last insight into a literal next move. Be specific enough that I don't have to think.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":215,"category":"next-action","tone":"conversational","best_for":"Decision-makers seeking a confident starting nudge","text":"What would you do first if this were your problem? Just the first move.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":216,"category":"next-action","tone":"terse","best_for":"Developers mid-task who lost the thread","text":"Name the next file I should open and the first line I should change.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":217,"category":"next-action","tone":"pragmatic","best_for":"Low-energy moments when only tiny wins are possible","text":"Give me a 5-minute task that moves this forward. Nothing bigger.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":218,"category":"next-action","tone":"direct","best_for":"Writers staring at a blank page","text":"What's the first sentence I should write right now?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":219,"category":"next-action","tone":"playful","best_for":"Anyone tired of high-level advice","text":"Skip the strategy. What's the next button I click, message I send, or line I type?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":220,"category":"next-action","tone":"polite","best_for":"Users who think better with structure","text":"Hand me a checklist of the next three concrete actions, ordered.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":221,"category":"next-action","tone":"curious","best_for":"Solo workers who want a virtual pair","text":"If you were watching over my shoulder, what would you tell me to do this minute?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":222,"category":"next-action","tone":"direct","best_for":"Researchers and operators alike","text":"What's one search query, one message, or one command I should run next?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":223,"category":"next-action","tone":"vulnerable","best_for":"Late-night sessions and decision fatigue","text":"Pick the next move for me. I'm too tired to choose.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":224,"category":"next-action","tone":"playful","best_for":"Breaking out of pure-thinking ruts","text":"Give me the next physical action. Something I can do with hands or fingers in under a minute.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":225,"category":"next-action","tone":"curious","best_for":"Builders, researchers, and product folks","text":"What's the cheapest experiment I can run next to learn something real?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":226,"category":"next-action","tone":"polite","best_for":"Complex domains where the user feels out of depth","text":"Tell me what to do next as if I'm a junior who needs hand-holding.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":227,"category":"next-action","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Anyone over-planning and under-acting","text":"Forget the plan. What's the next move that gets a result in the world?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":228,"category":"next-action","tone":"playful","best_for":"Procrastinators who need a graceful out","text":"Suggest the next move. Then suggest a smaller, lazier alternative in case I won't do the first one.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":229,"category":"next-action","tone":"terse","best_for":"Mid-flow coders or writers","text":"What's the very next keystroke?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":230,"category":"next-action","tone":"direct","best_for":"Wrapping a long session into something actionable","text":"Convert this whole conversation into a single next-action I can do before closing this tab.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":231,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Numeric answers where the model skipped steps or made an arithmetic slip.","text":"Redo the calculation from scratch in this chat. Show each arithmetic step. Don't reference your previous answer until the end, then compare.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":232,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"curious","best_for":"Multi-step problems where the model anchored on a wrong intermediate.","text":"Pretend you've never seen this question. Solve it again, step by step, starting from the raw inputs. Then tell me where your two answers diverge.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":233,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"terse","best_for":"Quantitative claims that admit multiple solution paths (algebra vs. estimation, etc.).","text":"Re-derive that number using a different method than you used the first time. If the two methods agree, say so. If not, work out which is wrong.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":234,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Citations or quoted material that may be fabricated.","text":"Quote the exact source text you're paraphrasing for each factual claim. If you can't quote it, replace the claim with what you can actually substantiate.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":235,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"terse","best_for":"Answers laden with proper nouns, dates, statistics.","text":"For each named entity, date, and number in your answer, write one line: 'X — because Y.' If Y is just 'I think so,' strike X.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":236,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"polite","best_for":"Reasoning chains where one weak link contaminates the conclusion.","text":"Walk me through the derivation as if explaining to a colleague who will check every step. Stop at any step you can't justify and flag it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":237,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"curious","best_for":"Word problems where the model misapplied a formula to specific numbers.","text":"Solve it again with the numbers swapped to placeholders (a, b, c). Get the symbolic answer first, then plug the real values back in.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":238,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"playful","best_for":"Order-of-magnitude errors and unit mistakes.","text":"Estimate the answer with back-of-envelope reasoning before looking at what you said before. If the estimate is off by 10x, we have a problem.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":239,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Answers that hinge on unstated premises.","text":"List the assumptions your answer rests on. For each, derive what the answer becomes if that assumption is wrong. Now tell me which assumption you're least sure about.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":240,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"terse","best_for":"Physics, engineering, and conversion problems.","text":"Run the unit check. Write out every quantity with its units and confirm they cancel to the units of the final answer. Show the cancellation.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":241,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Constraint-satisfaction and equation-solving problems.","text":"Plug your answer back into the original constraints and verify each one is satisfied. List each constraint and the check.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":242,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"curious","best_for":"Answers that depend on one pivotal claim being true.","text":"Pick the single most load-bearing fact in your answer. Re-derive or re-justify it from first principles, ignoring what you said before.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":243,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"polite","best_for":"Structured outputs (tables, enumerations) where rows may have been confabulated.","text":"Reproduce the table/list from memory of the underlying facts, not from your previous output. Compare row by row. Note any silent edits.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":244,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Argumentative or interpretive claims that may have been one-sided.","text":"Try to prove the opposite conclusion. Build the strongest case you can. Then tell me which case is actually stronger and why.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":245,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"curious","best_for":"Problems where natural-language reasoning slipped on logic the symbolic form makes obvious.","text":"Translate the problem into a different representation (equation, diagram description, pseudo-code) and re-solve in that representation.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":246,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"terse","best_for":"Multi-figure answers where one number was wrong and contaminated downstream.","text":"Recompute each numeric value one at a time, in isolation, showing the formula and inputs. Then assemble. Don't copy any number from above.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":247,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Academic-style answers with potentially fabricated references.","text":"For each citation, reconstruct: author, year, venue, and one sentence of the actual finding. If any field is a guess, replace the citation with 'unsourced.'","tier":"experimental"},{"id":248,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"polite","best_for":"Reasoning problems where the model committed too early to a wrong branch.","text":"Re-solve, but think out loud at each branch point: what alternatives did you consider, and why this one? Show the discarded paths.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":249,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"playful","best_for":"Domain-heavy text where small inaccuracies cluster.","text":"Imagine a domain expert is reading this and will circle the first error. Re-read line by line as them and either defend the line with a fact or fix it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":250,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"curious","best_for":"Combinatorics, probability, and recursive problems.","text":"Solve the simpler version of this problem first with smaller numbers. Verify by hand. Then scale up using the same method and compare.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":251,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"polite","best_for":"Cases where the model misread the question and answered a near-miss.","text":"Restate the original question in your own words. Then answer it fresh in 3 sentences. If your new answer contradicts the old, work out which is right.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":252,"category":"verify-factcheck","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Long answers mixing solid and shaky claims.","text":"Treat your last answer as a draft from someone else. Mark each sentence: [verified by re-derivation], [restated unchecked], or [cannot verify]. Now redo the [cannot verify] ones.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":253,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Wishy-washy answers that list 3 options without committing","text":"Pick one. State the single criterion that made it win and why the runners-up lost on that same axis.","tier":"core"},{"id":254,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"curious","best_for":"Multi-option responses where tradeoffs were never named","text":"If I could only do one of the things you suggested, which one and what would I lose by skipping the others?","tier":"core"},{"id":255,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Hedged 'it depends' answers that dodge the call","text":"Your answer hedged. Name the actual recommendation, the one criterion that decided it, and the strongest counter-argument you rejected.","tier":"core"},{"id":256,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"terse","best_for":"Lists presented without prioritization","text":"Rank your options 1 to N on the one dimension that actually matters here. Say what that dimension is first.","tier":"core"},{"id":257,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"playful","best_for":"Low-confidence answers presenting alternatives as equals","text":"Bet your reputation on one of the options. Which and why that one over the next-best?","tier":"core"},{"id":258,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"curious","best_for":"Answers that balanced too many competing concerns","text":"What would the decision look like if you weighted correctness 80 percent and everything else 20? Pick on that basis.","tier":"core"},{"id":259,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Buffet-style answers offering many paths","text":"Drop the menu. Give me the recommendation a senior engineer would give a junior asking the same thing, and the reason they'd give it.","tier":"core"},{"id":260,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"terse","best_for":"Verbose answers that bury or omit the actual recommendation","text":"Tell me your pick in one sentence, then the deciding factor in one sentence. Nothing else.","tier":"core"},{"id":261,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"curious","best_for":"Answers that are plausible-sounding but untested","text":"If we ran your suggestion past a skeptic, which one would survive their hardest question? Pick that one and tell me the question.","tier":"core"},{"id":262,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"polite","best_for":"Equivocal answers shared with stakeholders","text":"Could you commit to one path and explain what specifically made the others worse? I need to defend this choice to someone.","tier":"core"},{"id":263,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"playful","best_for":"Analysis-paralysis answers with too many branches","text":"Pretend the other options don't exist. What would you build first and what assumption made you choose it?","tier":"core"},{"id":264,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"terse","best_for":"Answers where options seemed interchangeable","text":"Name the tiebreaker. What property does your top choice have that none of the others do?","tier":"core"},{"id":265,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Optimistic answers that ignored downside","text":"Make the call. Which option, what tradeoff you accepted, and the one scenario where you'd regret it.","tier":"core"},{"id":266,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"curious","best_for":"Answers that presented compatible options as if all viable","text":"If your reasoning is right, only one of those options actually fits. Which, and what part of the problem rules out the rest?","tier":"core"},{"id":267,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Endless pros/cons answers with no resolution","text":"Stop weighing. Decide. Then tell me what evidence would have to change for you to switch picks.","tier":"core"},{"id":268,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"playful","best_for":"Equally-weighted recommendations with no priority","text":"Of everything you suggested, which one would you be most embarrassed to omit? Lead with that and why.","tier":"core"},{"id":269,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"curious","best_for":"Future-tense waffling about what could be done","text":"Imagine I already shipped one of your options. Which one and what made it the obvious choice in hindsight?","tier":"core"},{"id":270,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Catalog-style responses without conclusion","text":"Your answer reads like a menu. Convert it into a verdict: one pick, one because-clause, one rejected alternative with its fatal flaw.","tier":"core"},{"id":271,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"polite","best_for":"Answers without anticipated pushback","text":"What would you choose if I told you we have to defend this in code review tomorrow? Give me the argument first, then the choice.","tier":"core"},{"id":272,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"curious","best_for":"Reversibility-blind recommendations","text":"Which option is hardest to undo? Which is safest to try first? Pick one and tell me which question drove your pick.","tier":"core"},{"id":273,"category":"finalize-ship","tone":"playful","best_for":"Answers where the model couldn't pick a winner","text":"Cross out the weakest option first and tell me why it loses. Then the next. Last one standing is your answer.","tier":"core"},{"id":275,"category":"concretize","tone":"demanding","best_for":"migration plans and upgrade guides where generic role-words hide which package is meant","text":"Name the actual names. If you wrote 'the thing', 'the system', or 'the approach', replace each with the literal proper noun as it actually appears.","tier":"core"},{"id":276,"category":"concretize","tone":"terse","best_for":"how-to instructions that gesture at commands instead of giving them","text":"Rewrite this so a beginner could follow each step verbatim. No 'do the thing' — write the literal action, the literal input, with no filling-in-the-blanks left.","tier":"core"},{"id":277,"category":"concretize","tone":"polite","best_for":"code explanations that assert how something works without grounding","text":"For every factual claim, cite the source — the passage, the section, the moment. If you can't, mark it (unverified) and we'll go check together.","tier":"core"},{"id":278,"category":"concretize","tone":"demanding","best_for":"performance and capacity discussions that drift into adjectives","text":"Pin the numbers. If you said 'large', 'slow', 'many', or 'most', give the actual figure — or the order of magnitude you actually mean.","tier":"core"},{"id":280,"category":"concretize","tone":"demanding","best_for":"code suggestions that assume an API shape without checking","text":"Read back what you're relying on, exactly the way the original states it. If you're guessing, say so out loud before you guess.","tier":"core"},{"id":281,"category":"concretize","tone":"polite","best_for":"design recommendations leaning on appeals to consensus","text":"Name three real examples that do this — a person, a place, a project, an idea, a moment. Canonical names or links, not 'many do it' or 'common practice'.","tier":"core"},{"id":282,"category":"concretize","tone":"terse","best_for":"debugging advice that describes errors abstractly","text":"Show me the literal text someone would see — copy-paste ready, in the exact words. Not a paraphrase.","tier":"core"},{"id":283,"category":"concretize","tone":"demanding","best_for":"configuration guidance that punts on the specifics","text":"Replace 'do X appropriately' with the actual step, the actual value, and the actual location. Vague verbs are escape hatches.","tier":"core"},{"id":284,"category":"concretize","tone":"polite","best_for":"explanations that lean on placeholder examples","text":"Give a worked example with real inputs and real outputs. Not placeholders — values that could plausibly appear in the actual problem.","tier":"core"},{"id":285,"category":"concretize","tone":"playful","best_for":"advice given in the abstract for a concrete repo","text":"Walk me through this on the actual material in front of you. If you don't know what's there, look first, then talk.","tier":"core"},{"id":286,"category":"concretize","tone":"terse","best_for":"bug reports and reproduction steps","text":"What's the smallest demonstration? Give me the minimum example, the exact setup, what you predicted, and what actually happened.","tier":"core"},{"id":289,"category":"concretize","tone":"polite","best_for":"claims about documented behavior","text":"Quote the source. Find the passage, paste the sentence, link or cite it. If the source doesn't say it, tell me where it actually came from.","tier":"core"},{"id":291,"category":"concretize","tone":"curious","best_for":"operational advice that ignores environment context","text":"Be specific about which context applies. Which scenario, which audience, which conditions? Generic answers usually hide a wrong assumption.","tier":"core"},{"id":292,"category":"concretize","tone":"playful","best_for":"explanations softened by frequency hedges","text":"If your answer used the word 'typically', 'usually', or 'often', rewrite that clause with the actual frequency and the actual condition that triggers it.","tier":"core"},{"id":293,"category":"concretize","tone":"terse","best_for":"pattern-matching tasks described in prose","text":"Give me the exact rule you'd use — the literal pattern, the literal criterion. Not 'something that matches X' — the actual expression of it.","tier":"core"},{"id":294,"category":"concretize","tone":"demanding","best_for":"appeals to anonymous authority or 'best practice'","text":"Name names. Which person, group, or document made this call? If you don't know, say 'I don't know' instead of attributing it to 'common practice'.","tier":"core"},{"id":295,"category":"concretize","tone":"playful","best_for":"quantitative claims missing units","text":"Tell me the units. Minutes vs hours, dollars vs euros, people vs groups, daily vs annual. Numbers without units are decoration.","tier":"core"},{"id":296,"category":"concretize","tone":"polite","best_for":"verification and validation procedures left implicit","text":"If someone had to verify this tomorrow, what's the first action they'd take? Then the next. Then the next. Don't skip a step.","tier":"core"},{"id":297,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Drafts soaked in qualifier words that dilute every claim.","text":"Highlight every hedge: 'arguably', 'perhaps', 'in many ways', 'somewhat', 'fairly', 'rather'. Delete each one and tell me which deletions changed the meaning.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":298,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"terse","best_for":"Pieces that circle the same point across paragraphs.","text":"List the three ideas your draft repeats. For each repetition, pick the strongest instance and cut the others.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":299,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"curious","best_for":"Paragraphs that take three sentences to get started.","text":"Where are you throat-clearing before the actual point? Find the warmup sentences and delete them so each paragraph opens on the verb.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":300,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Confident analysis dressed in cowardly language.","text":"Mark every sentence that hedges a claim you actually believe. Rewrite those as direct assertions.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":301,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"playful","best_for":"Bloated prose where a length budget is the cleanest test.","text":"Take a 200-word paragraph and rewrite it at 80 words without losing any claim. Then show me what you cut and why.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":302,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"terse","best_for":"Academic-style filler phrases.","text":"Find every 'it is important to note', 'it should be mentioned', 'one might argue'. These are throat-clearing. Cut them.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":303,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"polite","best_for":"Drafts padded with 'somewhat', 'relatively', 'fairly', 'quite'.","text":"Which adverbs in this draft are doing real work, and which are just softening? Strike the softeners.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":304,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Essays where paragraphs duplicate each other's thesis.","text":"Read the first sentence of each paragraph. If two say the same thing, kill one paragraph entirely.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":305,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"curious","best_for":"Drafts where the writer is hiding behind politeness.","text":"Find every qualifier that protects you from being wrong. Then ask: do you actually think this might be wrong, or are you just being polite?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":306,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"playful","best_for":"Long-form drafts where the core point is buried.","text":"Pretend you have to send this as a text message. What survives?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":307,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"polite","best_for":"Compound sentences that smuggle in filler clauses.","text":"Every sentence with two clauses joined by 'and' or 'while' — try splitting them. Then ask if the weaker half should exist at all.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":308,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Drafts full of true-but-pointless statements.","text":"Which sentences would a skeptical editor circle and write 'so what?' next to? Cut those or earn them.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":309,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"terse","best_for":"Pieces that keep going past the moment of insight.","text":"Find the conclusion you've already made by paragraph three. Everything after that which doesn't add evidence or a new turn — cut it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":310,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"curious","best_for":"Drafts where the writer can sense flatness but not locate it.","text":"Read it aloud in your head. Where do you skim? That's the dead weight. Name those spots and remove them.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":311,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Drafts hedged with vague-scope phrases.","text":"Audit every 'in many ways', 'to some extent', 'in a sense'. These say nothing. Delete and don't replace.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":312,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"polite","best_for":"Drafts where ideas are restated 'for clarity'.","text":"Show me the same point made twice. Which version is sharper? Keep that one. Delete the other without trying to merge them.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":313,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"playful","best_for":"Pieces with ceremonial openings that delay the point.","text":"If I deleted your draft's first sentence, would the piece be worse? Try it. Now try the first paragraph.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":314,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"curious","best_for":"Drafts where hedging masks real conviction.","text":"Which claims are you softening because you're scared they sound too strong? List them as the bold version and see if you believe them.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":315,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Drafts cluttered with asides and self-references.","text":"Every parenthetical, every aside, every 'as I mentioned earlier'. Highlight them. Justify each one or cut it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":316,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"polite","best_for":"Drafts that have lost their thesis under accumulation.","text":"What's the one sentence this draft is actually trying to say? Write that sentence. Now look at everything that isn't supporting it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":317,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"terse","best_for":"Drafts where multiple hedges pile up in single sentences.","text":"Count the qualifying words per sentence. Any sentence with more than one — pick the most necessary qualifier and drop the rest.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":318,"category":"simplify-cut","tone":"playful","best_for":"Drafts that paraphrase themselves to seem thorough.","text":"Where does the draft repeat itself with slightly different words, hoping the reader won't notice? Show me those pairs and pick the winner.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":319,"category":"stress-test","tone":"demanding","best_for":"API designs, scripts, migrations, anything with side effects","text":"What happens if this runs twice? Walk me through the second execution step by step, assuming the first half-finished.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":320,"category":"stress-test","tone":"demanding","best_for":"API endpoints, shared resources, write paths","text":"Two users hit this at the exact same millisecond. Trace both requests interleaved and tell me where they collide.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":321,"category":"stress-test","tone":"curious","best_for":"distributed flows, multi-step writes, uploads","text":"Pretend the network dies halfway through. What state is the system left in, and who is responsible for cleaning it up?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":322,"category":"stress-test","tone":"polite","best_for":"data models, APIs with relationships, file systems","text":"Walk the deletion path. If I delete the parent, what becomes of the children, the references, and the cached copies?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":323,"category":"stress-test","tone":"terse","best_for":"resources, sessions, tokens, uploaded artifacts","text":"Who owns this thing once it exists? Name the actor, and tell me what happens when that actor disappears.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":324,"category":"stress-test","tone":"curious","best_for":"REST/RPC endpoints, retry-prone clients","text":"Replay the same request three times. Are the outcomes identical? If not, which call wins and why?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":325,"category":"stress-test","tone":"playful","best_for":"specs, workflows, event pipelines","text":"Now run the steps in reverse order. Does anything still make sense, or did you assume an ordering you never stated?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":326,"category":"stress-test","tone":"demanding","best_for":"async work, fire-and-forget patterns, queued jobs","text":"Show me the failure mode where the operation appears to succeed to the caller but actually didn't. How do you detect it?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":327,"category":"stress-test","tone":"terse","best_for":"create/upsert endpoints, naming, identity systems","text":"What if the resource already exists? What if it existed but was just deleted? What if it exists but belongs to someone else?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":328,"category":"stress-test","tone":"demanding","best_for":"auth flows, signed URLs, webhooks","text":"If a malicious user replays this request with a stale token, what protects the system? Name the specific check.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":329,"category":"stress-test","tone":"polite","best_for":"background jobs, cron, queue consumers","text":"The job is retried by an outer system after timing out. What does the second attempt see, and is that what you wanted?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":330,"category":"stress-test","tone":"curious","best_for":"validation layers, input pipelines, parsing code","text":"Trace the path of one bad input through every layer. Where does it get rejected, and where does it sneak through?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":331,"category":"stress-test","tone":"demanding","best_for":"sync engines, collaborative editors, eventual consistency systems","text":"Suppose two writes arrive out of order due to network delay. Whose version persists, and how does the loser find out?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":332,"category":"stress-test","tone":"polite","best_for":"APIs, libraries, public interfaces","text":"Read this back to me from the consumer's perspective. What can they break that you haven't defended against?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":333,"category":"stress-test","tone":"terse","best_for":"persistence layers, databases, file writes, caches","text":"Pull the plug mid-write. On reboot, what does the system believe is true, and does that match reality?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":334,"category":"stress-test","tone":"demanding","best_for":"any design or implementation answer","text":"Stop. Before defending this, list three things a hostile reviewer would ask about state, concurrency, or cleanup.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":335,"category":"stress-test","tone":"curious","best_for":"stateful logic, transactions, data structures","text":"What invariant must hold before, during, and after this operation? Now break it on purpose and see what catches it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":336,"category":"stress-test","tone":"demanding","best_for":"integrations, payment flows, external APIs","text":"If the upstream dependency returns success but lies, what happens? If it returns failure but actually succeeded?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":337,"category":"stress-test","tone":"polite","best_for":"long-running services, allocators, caches, logs","text":"Describe the steady state after a thousand of these have run. What grew? What leaked? What never got cleaned?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":338,"category":"stress-test","tone":"curious","best_for":"specs, code comments, schemas, documentation","text":"Who reads this after the writer is gone? Will they have what they need, or are you smuggling in tribal knowledge?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":339,"category":"stress-test","tone":"terse","best_for":"multi-step transactions, migrations, financial flows","text":"Name the operation that, if interrupted at exactly the wrong moment, leaves the system in a state with no recovery path.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":340,"category":"stress-test","tone":"playful","best_for":"internal APIs, libraries, anything with callers","text":"Imagine this is called by another system you didn't write, on a schedule you don't control. What assumption breaks first?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":341,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Code that solved a larger imagined problem instead of the real one.","text":"You overengineered this. Strip it to what the problem actually demands.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":342,"category":"subtract","tone":"terse","best_for":"Solutions padded with self-imposed requirements.","text":"Half of this exists to serve a problem you invented. Cut that half.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":343,"category":"subtract","tone":"curious","best_for":"Verbose implementations of small ideas.","text":"Would the senior engineer on this team have written this much code? Rework accordingly.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":344,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Drifting scope and gold-plating.","text":"There is a version of this that does exactly what was asked and nothing more. Find it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":345,"category":"subtract","tone":"terse","best_for":"Generic frameworks built where a hardcoded answer would do.","text":"You solved the general case. The user only had the specific one.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":346,"category":"subtract","tone":"curious","best_for":"Sprawling changes when a focused one would suffice.","text":"There is a smaller diff that gets us 90% of the way. What is it?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":347,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Multi-file edits where the core change is tiny.","text":"Find the one-line version of this change. Defend anything beyond that line.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":348,"category":"subtract","tone":"terse","best_for":"Real fixes buried in formatting and refactor noise.","text":"Most of this diff is collateral. What is the actual change?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":349,"category":"subtract","tone":"playful","best_for":"Diffs that ballooned past the original intent.","text":"If you could only keep three lines of this diff, which three? Try shipping just those.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":350,"category":"subtract","tone":"polite","best_for":"New helpers/abstractions when a local edit would do.","text":"Could you have done this by changing one thing that already exists instead of adding new ones? Try.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":351,"category":"subtract","tone":"terse","best_for":"Working code with awkward structure.","text":"There is a more elegant shape here. Find it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":352,"category":"subtract","tone":"curious","best_for":"Code that fights its own structure.","text":"This works, but it is not the right shape. What shape is it trying to be?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":353,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Technically correct but stylistically clumsy code.","text":"An experienced reader would wince at this. Rewrite it so they wouldn't.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":354,"category":"subtract","tone":"polite","best_for":"Code that may genuinely already be in good form.","text":"If you can't find a more elegant form, say so and defend the current shape. Otherwise, find it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":355,"category":"subtract","tone":"playful","best_for":"Procedural code that obscures intent.","text":"The right version of this probably reads like prose. Yours reads like a checklist.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":356,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Designs mixing incompatible paradigms or abstractions.","text":"This is not architecturally coherent. The pieces disagree about what this is.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":357,"category":"subtract","tone":"terse","best_for":"Code straddling reusable and one-shot intent.","text":"Half of this thinks it's a library, half thinks it's a script. Pick one.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":358,"category":"subtract","tone":"curious","best_for":"Modules doing several unrelated jobs.","text":"What is the one sentence that describes what this is? If you can't write it, that's the problem.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":359,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Code where structure and semantics drift apart.","text":"The naming, the layering, and the control flow each tell a different story. Make them agree.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":360,"category":"subtract","tone":"polite","best_for":"Code with inconsistent idioms across sections.","text":"If a new contributor read this top to bottom, would they form one mental model or three?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":361,"category":"subtract","tone":"terse","best_for":"Interfaces, generics, and indirection with one real caller.","text":"You added abstraction for a second case that does not exist. Collapse it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":362,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Overly parameterized code.","text":"Config knobs nobody will turn. Options nobody asked for. Find them and delete them.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":363,"category":"subtract","tone":"playful","best_for":"Cruft accumulated 'just in case'.","text":"What complexity here is paying rent? Evict the rest.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":364,"category":"subtract","tone":"polite","best_for":"Code that may not actually be over-complex.","text":"If this is already as simple as it can be, say so and explain why. Otherwise, simplify it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":365,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Speculative extensibility with no concrete use case.","text":"You built for a future that has not been requested. Build for today and let tomorrow refactor.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":366,"category":"subtract","tone":"curious","best_for":"Files that grew organically without pruning.","text":"Pretend the file is half this long. What stays?","tier":"experimental"},{"id":367,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Agentic session where the model keeps pausing instead of moving down a task list.","text":"Next item on the list. Don't ask. Don't recap. Do it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":368,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Restarting after a stall when the model could either work from an existing list or invent the next step.","text":"What's the next task? If there's a list, top one. If not, pick one and start.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":369,"category":"keep-going","tone":"polite","best_for":"Long-running autonomous work where you want to step away.","text":"Keep working down the list. Check back with me when it's empty or when you hit something only I can decide.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":370,"category":"keep-going","tone":"terse","best_for":"Minimal nudge when the list is visible and the model is just hesitating.","text":"Top of the list. Go.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":371,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"The model has been pausing for permission between every item; cancel that loop.","text":"Stop checking in. Each finished item is a green light to start the next. Continue.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":372,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"The model finished an item and is offering options or asking what's next instead of advancing.","text":"You finished one. Open the next. No 'anything else?' — just go.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":373,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"No active task and the model is idling instead of generating its own work.","text":"If no task is open, find a real one and start it.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":374,"category":"keep-going","tone":"playful","best_for":"Building rhythm — sequential close-one-open-the-next until the list drains.","text":"Mark this done. Now the next. Then the one after. Don't break the chain.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":375,"category":"keep-going","tone":"curious","best_for":"Proactive continuation when the list might be empty — generate before asking.","text":"What's still on the list? If nothing, what should be? Add it, then start.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":376,"category":"keep-going","tone":"demanding","best_for":"The model keeps narrating progress instead of quietly executing the loop.","text":"Open the list, do the next thing, close it. Repeat. Don't narrate the loop.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":377,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Overengineered solution; assert a simpler one exists without specifying it.","text":"You overengineered this. There is a simpler way.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":378,"category":"subtract","tone":"terse","best_for":"Large change proposed when a much smaller one would capture most of the value.","text":"There is a smaller delta that buys us most of the benefits.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":379,"category":"subtract","tone":"terse","best_for":"Working solution whose shape is wrong; let the model find the cleaner form.","text":"There is a more elegant way.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":380,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Code or plan where the pieces disagree about what the thing is.","text":"This is not architecturally coherent.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":381,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Model is solving a problem that wasn't asked alongside the real one.","text":"You're solving two problems here. One of them isn't real.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":382,"category":"subtract","tone":"playful","best_for":"Verbose solution when a well-known short idiom exists for the same problem.","text":"There's a name for this pattern. It's not yours.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":383,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Duplicate abstractions or layers doing the same thing under different names.","text":"This is two abstractions where one would do.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":384,"category":"subtract","tone":"terse","best_for":"Boilerplate or defensive scaffolding added by habit, not by requirement.","text":"Most of what you wrote is reflex, not requirement.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":385,"category":"subtract","tone":"curious","best_for":"Long verbose answer when a short one would carry the same information.","text":"An experienced reader would skip half of this.","tier":"experimental"},{"id":386,"category":"subtract","tone":"demanding","best_for":"Heavy work in the easy part of the problem, light treatment of the hard part.","text":"The hard part of this problem isn't where you spent your effort.","tier":"experimental"}]